« Not Good | Main | The Annual Office Christmas Party »

Chicago Style Christmas

Christmas may be over, but political gift giving continues…

In New York state, we are told that Caroline Kennedy is the favorite for Hillary Clinton’s soon-to-be-vacated Senate seat, and for the usual reasons of celebrity and money. Kennedy would have to run for election in 2010. Gov. David Paterson would also be on the ballot, as would New York’s other senator, Democrat Chuck Schumer.

On ABC’s “This Week With George Stephanopoulos,” Cokie Roberts explains that “her name and all that is going to work for the Democratic Party in New York, and that’s the calculation. … It’s not how great a senator she’s going to be.”

And Stephanopoulos adds, “They want someone else on the ballot with that star power who can raise the money.”

Would someone please draw a dark line of distinction between what we call a scandal in Illinois and business as usual in New York? Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich is accused of trying to sell a vacant Senate seat, while New York Gov. Paterson is expected to give a Senate seat to the woman whose family can raise lots of money for his benefit.

In an utterly straight-faced editorial, The New York Times noted that Caroline has much going for her: “As a public figure, she carries the glamour and poignancy of her family, the only living child of President John F. Kennedy and Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis. Senator Edward M. Kennedy, an uncle of hers, has reigned for years as the liberal clarion in the Senate. Another uncle, the late Bobby Kennedy, was a charismatic senator who represented New York 40 years ago.”

Famous father? Powerful uncle? Another charismatic uncle? Welcome to 19th century Parma.

For a while, I thought that only “Saturday Night Live” could save us from this absurdity, but then Politico burst through the nonsense with the perfect headline: “Nepotism Nation: Dems embrace dynasty politics.” The story lumped Caroline in with plans to save Vice President-elect Joe Biden’s Delaware Senate seat for his son and to give Colorado Sen. Ken Salazar’s job to Salazar’s brother.

Makes Obama’s rise seem a total miracle. But that’s another story.

Posted on Dec 26, 2008 at 09:00AM by Registered CommenterDoug in , | Comments8 Comments | References1 Reference

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments (8)

Who is this supposed to be? Not enough hair for Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich and it looks like a little boy so it isn't Carolyn Kennedy either ??

December 26 | Unregistered CommenterTeddy

Sad to say, Doug, but that is how politics works now.

December 26 | Unregistered Commenterhookercrook

Foe crissake, what credentials does Carolyn Kennedy have besides being a Kennedy?

December 26 | Unregistered CommenterGreg

It's a sad state of affairs when politicians have the power to "save a seat in the Senate" for their sons or daughters. Nepotism. How low can we go?

December 26 | Unregistered CommenterTodd E.

Is anybody besides me working today? The expressway was empty coming into work and it is s l o w ! I would rather be....anywhere else!

December 26 | Unregistered CommenterFrank B.

No Frank, there are a couple of others: Dawn for one. And me. Everyone else seems to be at the Mall -- it was a challenge navigating between our office and the California Secretary of State's offices today because all lanes were struggling to shoehorn into Arden Fair Mall! What a mess! Offer a sale "and they will come", I guess. We're both really glad we have the weekend to relax!

Doug

December 26 | Unregistered CommenterDoug

Hook, I hear what you're saying: "that is how politics works now." But you know where I stand - if we accept it, it becomes the norm. Sorry, but it's not "the norm". It's reprehensible and we shouldn't accept it. Nepotism is destructive wherever you find it. But we have (or are supposed to have) "of the people, by the people, for the people..." But promising Senate seats to cronies and relatives takes that important part of the process away from us. It makes us more a dictatorship than a democracy.

But if we don't object, if we just accept whatever they do, then we can't complain. If you caught an employee stealing from your till, you'd fire the thief, right? How is this any different?

Doug

December 26 | Unregistered CommenterDoug

I had never heard of this practice and I'm pretty upset to know it goes on. I thought a senator had to be elected and that is a it should be. No politician or anyone else should be allowed to give (or sell) one. It feels like our government is as corrupt as the gangland mobs of the 30's and 40's! How do we fix this broken system?

December 27 | Unregistered CommenterEmily
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.